Gaza is Everyone's Concern

By Richard Pithouse · 24 Jul 2014

A+ A= A-
    Print this page       comments
     
Picture: Free Gaza/flickr
Picture: Free Gaza/flickr
Every time a man has contributed to the victory of the dignity of the spirit, every time a man has said no to an attempt to subjugate his fellows, I have felt solidarity with his act.
- Frantz Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, 1952


The ruthless assault on Gaza has sometimes been presented in our media, and on occasion in some solidarity efforts too, as an issue that is solely of concern to Muslim people. It is true that in recent years state politics in both Palestine and Israel has taken on a more religious inflection. There has also been a growth in popular movements in both Palestine and Israel that frame the conflict in religious terms. Moreover there is a historical religious dimension to the origins of this conflict in so far as the long persecution of the Jews in Europe, which is the root cause of Zionism as an armed colonial project, cannot be divorced from a murderous European intolerance, that, for a thousand years, framed itself as Christian. Europe, long imagined as a Christian space, displaced its historic moral debt to the Jews of Europe onto the Palestinians.

But this conflict began as a colonial occupation. It did not start as a religious war and has never been reducible to the question of religion. Some Palestinians are Christian, many are secular and Palestinian resistance to Israeli oppression has often been organised on the basis of nationalism or left wing ideas. Edward Said, one of the most compelling advocates of the Palestinian cause, was born into a Christian family. And while leading Christian figures, including Desmond Tutu, have taken a clear position in support of justice for the Palestinian people it is also true that, from the United States to Uganda, many of the most impassioned defenders of the Israeli state are right-wing Christians. In Israel, in South Africa and around the world many Jewish people, religious and secular, have taken a clear position against the Israeli state and in solidarity with the Palestinian struggle. You cannot deduce a person’s religion from where they stand in this conflict nor can you deduce their position on this conflict from their religion. Moreover in many parts of the world, like Ireland or South Africa, popular solidarity with the Palestinian struggle is generally rooted in a shared history of colonial oppression rather than shared religious convictions.

But although not all Palestinians are Muslim and not all Jews, or Christians, support the oppression of Palestinians by the state of Israel, this conflict does have an inescapable contemporary religious dimension resulting from the fact that, since the latter years of the Cold War, American imperialism has actively sought to politicise Islam. This was first undertaken in order to cultivate an ally in opposition to the Soviet Union.  After the Cold War the politicisation of Islam was used to manufacture a new enemy that could legitimate American attempts to control the world’s oil. Among other crimes this led to the devastation of Iraq in the name of human rights and freedom – a crime for which the butchers in Washington will never have to account to any court because global power relations are such that white and Western power continues to be equated with reason, modernity, virtue and civilization even when it engages in mass murder for the purpose of wholesale theft.

One result of the construction of Islam as the new enemy of the West is that Palestinians are presented, from the Jerusalem Post to the New York Times, as irrational, without regard for the sanctity of human life and as part of a lower form of culture that is a threat to what is assumed to be the enlightened, democratic and, in every respect, superior culture of Western civilization. This means that there is a degree to which Muslim people, around the world, have a particular stake in contesting the way in which a set of pejorative ideas about Islam are mobilised to dehumanise Palestinians. But this does not mean that the conflict in and around Palestine can be reduced to one of religious identity. Even when religious identities are mobilised in support of political objectives, a process that is particularly easy in this part of the world given its place in the history and imagination of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, we are still not dealing, at the ethical level, with a conflict between two or three religions as monolithic blocks. On the contrary there are always acute ethical conflicts within religions. All of the major world religions – Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam and Judaism – have enabled profoundly ethical orientations to the world and they all also carry entirely perverse currents that all decent people, irrespective of the accidents of their birth and their own religious choices, must oppose.

The particular stake that Muslim people have in opposing the demonization of Islam is not unique. After all women have a particular stake in opposing sexism, black people have a particular stake in opposing anti-black racism and gay people have a particular stake in opposing homophobia. But just as this does not let men, white people or straight people off the proverbial hook when it comes to the necessity to oppose these systems of oppression people who are not Muslim have a moral obligation to be in solidarity with all Palestinians as people, and, also, with Palestinian Muslims who are oppressed, in part, as Muslims. The assault on Gaza is, like the devastation of the Congo, or the ongoing disaster in Iraq, everyone’s concern. In the particular case of Gaza the way in which Islamophobia is used to legitimate oppression is also everyone’s concern. It is also true that the way in which Islam is sometimes misused to legitimate oppression, as in the Iraqi cities of Mosul, Fallujah and Tikrit at the moment, is everyone’s concern.

In 1940 the Nazis forced more than 400 000 Jewish people into a tiny corner of Warsaw that became known as the Warsaw Ghetto. More than half of these people were sent to the Treblinka death factory in 1942. In 1943 the residents of the ghetto began a campaign of armed resistance against the Nazis.  They held out, in a heroic struggle, for three months before the Nazis burnt and blew up the ghetto, building by building, murdering everyone they could find. In 2002 Mark Edelman, who was a Deputy Commander of the Jewish Military Organization in the uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto, wrote an open letter to the leaders and soldiers of all the militant groups in Palestine. He critiqued their methods but, nonetheless, addressed the Palestinian militants as militants, and, by implication, endorsed their struggle as a struggle for justice. A few months ago Chavka Fulman-Raban, one of the last survivors of the Warsaw Ghetto, gave a speech at the Ghetto-Fighters’ House Northern Israel in which she declared that:

All of my nearest, most beloved comrades fought from the rooftops, in the fires, from the bunkers.  Most of them perished.  I hurts me that I can no longer remember all their names.  We memorialize only a few.  But in my heart I am not parted from them, from the forgotten. …

Continue the rebellion.  A different rebellion of the here and now against evil, even the evil befalling our own and only beloved country.  Rebel against racism and violence and hatred of those who are different.  Against inequality, economic gaps, poverty, greed and corruption. Rebel against the Occupation.

This is what an ethical orientation to the world looks like. We are all – irrespective of the accidents of our birth or our religious choices – obligated to be in solidarity with the people of Gaza.
Dr. Pithouse teaches politics at Rhodes University.

Should you wish to republish this SACSIS article, please attribute the author and cite The South African Civil Society Information Service as its source.

All of SACSIS' originally produced articles, videos, podcasts and transcripts are licensed under a Creative Commons license. For more information about our Copyright Policy, please click here.

To receive an email notification when a new SACSIS article is published, please click here.

For regular and timely updates of new SACSIS articles, you can also follow us on Twitter @SACSIS_News and/or become a SACSIS fan on Facebook.

You can find this page online at http://sacsis.org.za/site/article/2083.

A+ A= A-
    Print this page       comments
     

Leave A Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by registered readers are published immediately. Why wait? Register now or log in!

Comments

DWAHTS Verified user
24 Jul

Apologist Nonsense

I am sorry but just because this issue started with settlement generations ago is no reason to say that it's not rooted in religion. Israel is a RELIGIOUS STATE, an absurd notion in itself, and Hamas, a fundamentalist religious movement, wants Israel "Removed from the face of the earth," a violent attitude that deserves to be shown contempt.

You cannot seriously put forward that in light of the above and that the two parties involved are battling over the sacred land each believes they are destined by prophecy to reclaim, that it's not essentially a religious issue.

As for demonizing religion, it's NOT demonizing to point out the facts, it's demonizing to kill, honour kill, stone for adultery, kill for apostasy etc. etc. Don't you dare make it a crime to point out a crime sir because you are afraid to do so.

Nonsense, nonsense, it's all nonsense, lets be serious for a moment here.

Make Israel a secular state and treat Hamas with the contempt they deserve and maybe, just maybe they will achieve what South Africa has, under the brilliant statesmanship of Mandela and secular compromise of our people.

Respond to this comment

MN
24 Jul

The Original Zionsts were Overwhelmingly Secular

Israel was founded as an ethnic state, not a religious state.

Nina
25 Jul

I don't think this article at all denies the religious paradigms through which Palestinian-Israeli interaction is frequently viewed. The point is that issues around human life, dignity, vulnerability and sovereignty supersede the loud chiliastic proclamations that fascinate and inflame. This article calls for people to recognize this and not to fall into the bogus discourse around "eternal conflict"; "chosen people"; "unchanging prophecy" that ultimately serves the Zionist cause through repetition and legitimation of utterance and/or demands an equally problematic opposing 'prophecy'. To recognize Palestinians as human beings deserving of a dignified life is to decontextualize and transcend religious discourse, whether Judaic, Christian or Islamic. Its rather simple. Great article.



Jonathan
24 Jul

The Zionist Movement

DWAHTS

The leaders of the Zionist movement, from its founding until now, were a-religious and even anti-religious. They founded Israel as an ethnic state for ethnic Jews. The 'religious' Jewish character of Israel is simply a tactic to win broad Jewish support. It is part of a deal that the secular, and often atheist, Zionist leaders made with religious Jews. And what exactly is that 'religious' character anyway? Personal status law? That does not make it a religious state.

Yes, Palestine should be a single secular democratic state, and the racist Zionists should be treated with the contempt that they deserve! But in such a state the contemptuous racist colonialists as well as the erstwhile-resistance Islamists in Hamas should be allowed to organise, form parties and contest elections. But such a state will NOT come about until Jewish Israelis decide to get rid of the racist leadership they have adopted, and realise that their future is tied in with their neighbours - who are not lesser beings than they are.

Save your contempt for the racists and occupiers, and cut some slack for those who have battled for 6 decades against occupation, colonialism, being kicked out of their homes, being orphaned and made refugees. And if they decide to express their resistance to these injustices through their religions - whether in the form of the Islamism of Hamas of the Palestinian Kairos of Christians - they are allowed that.

Respond to this comment

DWAHTS Verified user
25 Jul

I'm not speculating on what the tactic to win broad support is, I'm picking up on what they are putting down.

So being Jewish isn’t a religious thing? How else can one be Jewish? By Nation – no, by race, no then by what?

I have no contempt for the victims of these terrible crimes rooted in religion, I simply wish they could see that fighting ideology vs ideology is still fighting. Ideology, whether Nationalism or supernatural beliefs like religion, doesn't solve the problem it is the problem.

DWAHTS Verified user
25 Jul

Ethnic? Semantics

I've added a page to my website for religion in light of how much trouble it's causing in the world, and it ties in with how much trouble the US Neocon enable US Corporation empire is slowly taking over http://dwahts.weebly.com/religion.html

Definitions
25 Jul

Answer to "Who Is a Jew"

To the person maintaining this *is* about religion and asking "who is a Jew?", see Wikipedia's "Jewish" entry, subsection "Who is a Jew?." You do not have to follow Judaism to be Jewish. Ancestry, family lineage, and religious belief are all independently sufficient criteria.

Note that while religious affiliations and sentiments are invoked by all leaders in the conflict, it is not arbitrary that Israel repeatedly annexes valuable land that secures them water and other resources, and that Israel's primary backer, the US, has a well-documented and obviously imperial interest in controlling Middle Eastern oil reserves -- not to simply access the oil for itself but to control flows to other nations, and prices, as a leverage for global power.

Cheers



Alex
26 Jul

Thank You

This is a beautiful and profound piece of writing.

Respond to this comment



David Robert Lewis
26 Jul

Which Palestine?

Jewish Palestine became independent in 1948 along with Jordan in 1946. This follows from the 1919 agreement between King Faisal and Chaim Weizmann to set up a Palestinian and an Arab State. Because of WW2 and the events succeeding it, there were several wars until the end of the Cold War in 1989 -- Jordan occupied the West Bank from 1948-1967 following attempts to squash Jewish Palestine which was renamed Israel. In 1988 Palestine became a state for the very first time in history, until then it had always been a province or protectorate of an empire. This second Palestinian "state" was only recognised by the UN in 2013, so which Palestine are we talking about?

Respond to this comment



Eileen Sussholz
26 Jul

As a Jew who knows people who were in Auschwitz and who lost family in the second world war I can relate and sympathise with much of this article. However to portray the militant character of Jihadism, that seeks to destroy the infidels of the Western world, as a social construction by the West is simply absurd. If this is so, who flew the jets that destroyed the world trade centre? Who has a reign of terror in Mali, Kenya and Nigeria? Who denies gay people and women the rights that we have come to consider as our natural birth rights? Who now proposes that Iraqi women be subjected to genital mutilation? Is this all a fabrication of the West?

Respond to this comment



Eileen Sussholz
26 Jul

Colonial Occupation??

The statement "But this conflict began as a colonial occupation" is a complete misrepresentation of the beginnings of the state of Israel. The author fails to mention the Balfour declaration and the subsequent vote by the United Nations that preceded the birth of Israel as a nation.

Respond to this comment



Rory Verified user
30 Jul

Humanity

The Palestinians are people, the Israelis are people. That fact should be the most important one applied in any assessment of the situation in Gaza or anywhere else for that matter. Should people be behaving towards other people as they are in Gaza, no they should not. It is as simple as that and those involved should desist from this behaviour however long they have been practicing it whether it has a decades long history behind it or it is happening right now. There is simply NO justification for anti-human behaviour.

Respond to this comment